![]() But I’d be lying if I said I didn’t yearn for some of Things’ simplicity. This isn’t a deal-breaker, and I’m slowly getting used to TickTick’s UI. When viewed side-by-side, the two apps look remarkably similar, but TickTick attempts to cram too much text and rather old-fashioned iconography into its slender frame. It feels clean, inspiring, and a joy to use.īy comparison, there’s an awful lot going on when you make your way around the TickTick user interface. There’s plenty of white space, and the purpose of every available pixel has been carefully considered. Things stands above its competition almost solely because of its no-nonsense yet beautiful approach to user interface design. This is arguably a result of the deeper feature set and a desire to present as much information to the user as possible, but it will cause issues for anyone who loves Things for its design. However, I can’t escape one obvious caveat of switching from Things to TickTick, which is that the latter feels rather more cluttered. Indeed, the former is actually more functional than the latter, and there are a number of features within that list above that I’ve long wanted in Things (not to mention the ability to complete a future task in advance – come on, Cultured Code!). There aren’t really any feature deficits for me between TickTick and Things. The switch from Things to TickTick has been pretty seamless for me, and, crucially, it hasn’t halted my daily progress.īut it isn’t all roses. There’s so much more to TickTick than the above, but it does that wonderful thing of allowing you to use as much of the app as you need without being distracted by the more fancy stuff.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |